![]() |
|||
|
|
![]() |
AOA Highlights |
Executive Summary A FRONT BURNER ISSUE: LOOKING FOR ANSWERS: ATO SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES: AVIATION CATALYST FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH: MINETA SIGNS OPEN SKIES AGREEMENT WITH INDIA: LASERS TO WARN PILOTS IN CAPITAL AREA: SABATINI AND RITZ ON LEADERSHIP: THE LAST WORD: A FRONT BURNER ISSUE: Here’s an excerpt from the Administrator’s speech to the Chamber of Commerce: “Just like the airlines we serve, the Aviation Trust Fund that supplies most of the FAA’s operating revenue and capital investments are largely fed by ticket prices. As airline revenues go, so do we. And vice versa. The problem is that ticket prices are not related to any real measure of productivity for the FAA. For those of you who’ve been following aviation safety, you know that we’re in the safest three-year period in aviation history. But no matter how many takeoffs and landings, no matter how many radars or runways, no matter how low the accident rate goes ... most of our income is pegged to ticket prices... which everywhere you look continue to fall.” http://www.faa.gov/news/speeches/speeches/Blakey/2005/speeches_blakey_050421.htm LOOKING FOR ANSWERS: Nobody here has a best answer to the challenge described above. That’s why the Administrator is hosting a two-day FAA Funding Forum this week — yesterday and today— to pick the brains of stakeholders from the private sector, Congressional staffers and other government representatives who presumably will have some good ideas to share that we hadn’t thought of. The Administrator herself has no preferred alternative funding mechanism or favored funding model in mind. She just wants to start the dialogue, because the taxes that fuel the Trust Fund expire in ’07 and we’d better have some good alternatives in our hip pocket long before then. Participants in the forum include Secretary Mineta and Administrator Blakey. They’ll speak, to be sure, but DOT and FAA participants will be mostly in a listening mode. For more on the Trust Fund challenge, see Editorial in this edition of Focus FAA.) ATO SUCCESSES AND CHALLENGES: Chief Operating Officer Russ Chew testified before the House Aviation Subcommittee last week on ATO successes and challenges. Simultaneously, the FAA published the first annual ATO Performance Report, which describes the organization’s activities and achievements since the launch of the Air Traffic Organization (ATO) in 2004. The report is posted on the front page of the FAA public website at http://www.faa.gov Also testifying at that hearing was Jeff Shane, Under Secretary of Transportation for Policy, who discussed the Joint Planning and Development Organization (JPDO). DOT Inspector General Ken Mead also testified, as did GAO director Gerald Dillingham. A second panel of witnesses included NATCA President John Carr; Tom Brantley, President, Professional Airways Systems Specialists; and John Douglas, President and CEO of the Aerospace Industries Association. By going to the House website, you can get all seven statements in one spot: http://www.house.gov/transportation/ AVIATION CATALYST FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH, SAYS BLAKEY: The FAA will be hosting a seminar in Washington later this year to underscore the importance of aviation as a catalyst for economic growth. (For the Administrator’s Chile speech and the one before the Chamber of Commerce, see http://www.faa.gov/news/speeches/?/Type=Blakey2005#Blakey2005 ) MINETA SIGNS OPEN SKIES AGREEMENT WITH INDIA: Doug Lavin, Assistant Administrator for International Aviation, accompanied the Secretary. He said Mineta also announced in India the establishment of the Indian Aviation Cooperation (ACP) program, which is a government industry partnership focused on aviation safety initiatives. The India ACP is modeled after a similar program in China and is chaired jointly by the FAA and industry. A disappointment, said Lavin, is that a memorandum of agreement for FAA to provide technical assistance to India was not signed during the trip. Lavin, who is leaving the FAA at the end of the month for a senior Vice President position with the International Air Transport Association (IATA), got warm praise from the Administrator yesterday at Lavin’s final Flight Plan Review meeting. She praised the energy and innovations he brought to the international program and said that his contributions will endure long after he is gone. LASERS TO WARN PILOTS IN CAPITAL AREA: If you’re wondering why we would use lasers to warn pilots when just recently we made such a big deal about the dangers of lasers beamed into the cockpit, you are not alone. The same thought occurred to us. The answer is that the warning lasers to be used in this instance are low-level and are not harmful to a pilot’s vision. Hundreds of pilots stray inadvertently into restricted airspace around the capital every year, but since 9/11 this is a much bigger deal. You no doubt recall that last year a plane carrying the governor of Kentucky to former President Ronald Reagan’s funeral penetrated restricted airspace by mistake and forced the evacuation of the Capitol. That helped propel this latest move. SABATINI AND RITZ ON LEADERSHIP: Government Executive for April 13 had an interesting article about leadership — or lack thereof — in Federal service. According to the article, 75 percent of top civil service executives are older than 50 and nearly half are over 55, and we’re not doing much to prepare the next generation of leaders. The article basically consists of leadership profiles of several Federal executives or managers who are considered real leaders in their organizations. Leadership is a hard concept to define, but you know it when you see it, and leadership is one of the areas we got low marks on in the Employee Attitude Survey. Last week, we sat down in front of a camera with Nick Sabatini, Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety, and Lindy Ritz, Director of the Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City. They discussed what leadership looks like to them, the difference between management and leadership, what they are doing to prepare their successors to take over, and more. We’ll have this interview available for viewing next week on webcast (via the employee site) and will send out the word long in advance on the exact day and time. Stay tuned. THE LAST WORD: Finally, if you’ve ever wondered where an expression like “it’ll cost you an arm and leg” came from, it’s not a Mafia term for exacting an overdue ‘protection” payment. It actually has to do with portrait painting, or sculpting too, we would imagine. In any event, according to an unnamed source, prices charged by painters were not based on how many people were to be painted, but by how many limbs were to be painted. Limbs, not as in trees, but as in arms and legs. So, painting a full-length portrait — arms and legs — would cost more than a portrait of someone just from the waist up. Stands to reason. Ergo, the expression, “okay, but that will cost you an arm and a leg.” Sounds apocryphal, I know. Maybe even an urban legend. Hope to see you in a couple of weeks.
|
| We appreciate your feedback: jim.tise@faa.gov
|